You are here: Resources » Reference Library
   
Get syndicated feeds from our Journal!  Add to Technorati Favorites

Vertical Banner 1

   Minimize

Vertical Banner 2

   Minimize

Enter Title

   Minimize

Reference Library

Reference Library

   Minimize

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
By Robert Williscroft @ 10:40 AM :: 3966 Views :: 0 Comments :: Article Rating :: Environment
 

Title

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Download

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Author(s)

Gerhard Gerlich & Ralf D. Tscheuschner

Source

Institut für Mathematische Physik

Publication Date

January 6, 2009

Citation

Gerhard Gerlich & Ralf D. Tscheuschner, "Falsifcation Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics," Institut fur Mathematische Physik, January 6, 2009

Notes

This paper puts the lie to the concept of an atmospheric greenhouse

 

The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a ctitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. According to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation. In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clarifed. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned di erence of 33°C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified.

Rating
Comments

Most Popular References

   Minimize
Read the Sunspots (Wednesday, June 20, 2007)
v: 7266 | c: 0 Article Rating
Holocene Treeline History and Climate Change Across Northern Eurasia (Tuesday, March 9, 1999)
v: 7022 | c: 0 Article Rating
Ozone Hoax, Not Hole (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)
v: 6641 | c: 2 Article Rating
Solar peak expected in 2011-2012 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)
v: 6329 | c: 0 Article Rating
The Earth's Climate Is Seesawing, According To Climate Researchers (Saturday, April 28, 2007)
v: 6125 | c: 0 Article Rating

CLA

   Minimize
The Chicken Little Agenda: Debunking "Experts’" Lies

Block 1

   Minimize