You are here: Resources » Reference Library
   
Get syndicated feeds from our Journal!  Add to Technorati Favorites
Hot Links
Read Me
HotQuant Portals

Reference Library

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Thursday, April 06, 2006
Sixty accredited climate experts question anthropogenic warming
By Robert Williscroft @ 7:36 AM :: 695 Views :: 0 Comments :: :: Environment
 

Title

Open Kyoto to debate – Sixty scientists call on Harper to revisit the science of global warming

Download

Sixty accredited climate experts question anthropogenic warming

Author(s)

Dr. Ian D. Clark, Dr. Tad Murty, Dr. R. Timothy Patterson, Dr. Fred Michel, Dr. Madhav Khandekar, Dr. Paul Copper, Dr. Ross McKitrick, Dr. Tim Ball, Dr. Andreas Prokoph, Mr. David Nowell, M.Sc., Dr. Christopher Essex, Dr. Gordon E. Swaters, Dr. L. Graham Smith, Dr. G. Cornelis van Kooten, Dr. Petr Chylek, Dr./Cdr. M. R. Morgan, FRMS, Dr. Keith D. Hage, Dr. David E. Wojick, P.Eng., Rob Scagel, M.Sc., Dr. Douglas Leahey, Paavo Siitam, M.Sc., Dr. Chris de Freitas, Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Mr. George Taylor, Dr. R.M. Carter, Mr. William Kininmonth, Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, Dr.Gerrit J. van der Lingen, Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, Dr. Gary D. Sharp, Dr. Roy W. Spencer, Dr. Al Pekarek, Dr. Marcel Leroux, Dr. Paul Reiter, Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, Dr. Hans H.J. Labohm, Dr. Lee C. Gerhard, Dr. Asmunn Moene, Dr. August H. Auer, Dr. Vincent Gray, Dr. Howard Hayden, Dr. Jack Barrett, Dr. William J.R. Alexander, Dr. S. Fred Singer, Dr. Harry N.A. Priem, Dr. Robert H. Essenhigh, Dr. Sallie Baliunas, Douglas Hoyt, Dipl.-Ing. Peter Dietze, Dr. Boris Winterhalter, Dr. Wibjorn Karlen, Dr. Hugh W. Ellsaesser, Dr. Art Robinson, Dr. Arthur Rorsch, Dr. Alister McFarquhar, Dr. Richard S. Courtney

Source

http://www.canada.com/

Publication Date

April 6, 2006

Citation

"An open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper," Special to the Financial Post; canada.com, April 6, 2006

Notes

Sixty accredited experts in climate and related scientific disciplines propose that balanced, comprehensive public-consultation sessions be held so as to examine the scientific foundation of the Canadian federal government's climatechange plans. Their basis is that observational evidence does not support today's computer climate models, so there is little reason to trust model predictions of the future.

Rating
Comments
Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Click here to post a comment
Most Popular References
The Chicken Little Agenda: Debunking "Experts’" Lies
Reference Topics
Reference Archive
Robert's Stuff