You are here: Journal
   
Get syndicated feeds from our Journal!  Add to Technorati Favorites
Hot Links
Read Me

The Dead Hand Journal

20

A news story written by Gwynne Roberts back in 2001 about a possible Saddam nuclear test detonation in the Lake Rezzaza region of Iraq in 1989 was widely and vociferously discredited by nearly all news agencies, but especially by the Left. Based on that story and other research, I wrote a narrative in 2004 that depicted the probable sequence of events that lead to this test. (To understand the rest of this article, first read my narrative.) Neither the Roberts story nor my narrative have ever been confirmed. Now, new evidence has appeared in the form of translated documents from the thousands of pages captured by American forces in Iraq that appears to lend credence to these stories.

Iraqi document ISGQ 2004-00224003 dated February 7, 2001, has been partially translated by a person identified as jveritas, and appears on several websites dedicated to distributing these documents. Most of the focus on this document is on a discussion in the upper echelons of the Iraqi intelligence about mass graves in Southern Iraq and how to shift the blame to the Coalition forces and make it look like these mass graves were the result of massacres committed by the Coalition forces back in 1991 during Desert Storm. This document specifically discusses how to give CNN priority coverage of the story, so it will have an effect on the international arena.

The translation that follows is of the first part of the document, which focuses on the graves and the CNN angle. The rest of the three-page document was not translated by jveritas, but he relates that it describes further details of the deception on how to make big military funerals for the people in the mass graves, and how high level state officials would participate in these funerals.

Here is the text of the Partial Translation:

The Republic of Iraq
The Intelligence Apparatus
Date: 7/2/2001
No 1687

In the Name of God the Merciful the Most Compassionate

Secret

To: The respectful Mr. Director of the Fourth Directory

Ref: Your letter secret and immediate numbered B 264 on 2/4/2001

1. No information is available to us about the Mass Graves in the Southern Region.

2.We seek to achieve the observation the following matters:

A. Inspect the graves to confirm the existence of Nuclear Radiations.

B. Were they buried alive or their death was by suffocation.

C. Are they military personnel or civilians.

D. Are there tombstones that carry the names of the martyrs

E. Identify accurate marks and proofs of the graves and the possibility to reach it quickly and identify it.

3. We do not agree that the declaration about it through a direct Iraqi media in the first stage at least and not to cause public and party reaction so that the subject will take as a priority an international interest, and we should work on the following direction during this stage:

A. Leak the news through reliable sources, News agencies or Satellite stations, and that there is confusion, and indications from the members of the Coalition forces about the existence of mass graves civilians and military personnel in the South of Iraq.

B. The attempt to search for soldiers from the Coalition forces in a serious way to mention these truth through the agencies.

C. Ask some of the friendly countries with good technology to find these graves and for sure it will be asked from some news agencies in these countries to humanly participate in this effort and in case it is discovered there will be media reactions internationally and foreign and this media must be given a big space to repeat it and leak it to take its natural form of influence on the countries that made this bad deed and give it to the international general opinion.

D. Not to dig these grave by the Iraqi side, and it is possible to make a dialog with the CNN channel to give them a priority on this subject to have an influence over the international arena and it will be accepted more than the Iraqi media.

End of Partial Translation

The key information here is the request to "confirm" the presence of suspected radioactive contamination of the grave site and the bodies, and that the site is in "Southern Iraq."

The story told by Roberts, and relayed in my narrative, is that the workers at the Lake Rezzaza site (some 80 miles southwest of Baghdad) were contaminated and subsequently buried in mass graves nearby. This document specifically refers to mass graves in Southern Iraq, and brings up the subject of radioactive contamination.

Furthermore, the original story referred to a 4th Directory, unknown at that time, that was in charge of the nuclear research. This document is addressed to the "Director of the Fourth Directory."

The document is authentic, and the translation appears true to the original text. While not conclusive, it certainly opens up the door to further investigation of what really happened near and under Lake Rezzaza back in 1989. It is no longer so far-fetched that Saddam may actually have detonated a nuclear devise with parts supplied by the collapsing Soviet Union for a badly needed cash infusion.

A direct consequence of this possibility is that Dr. Khalid and his colleagues really were able to construct three Hiroshima-type bombs. Dr. Jafaar and his group, with technical help from the Russians and French, along with plans purchased in the United States, really did complete construction of three implosion-type bombs with significantly greater kilo-tonnage. And during the mid-1990s, they really did complete three tritium-boosted thermonuclear bombs, and that they are all presently stored in a deep underground bunker hidden in the Hemrin Mountains.

Even if the reality of this is remote, we need to pay attention to, and follow up on, the real possibility that the Hemrin Mountains still contain their deadly secret, just awaiting the right time to appear.

Comments

Anonymous
# Anonymous
Saturday, January 20, 2007 11:49 AM
Fascinating.

A couple of points of clarification:

1. When you say "implosion device," are you referring to a tritium-boosted thermonuclear bomb--a fusion bomb--rather than the less-powerful fission variety?

2. If so, what are the odds that sufficient tritium remains in the device to produce a successful thermonuclear detonation?
Anonymous
# Anonymous
Saturday, January 20, 2007 11:55 AM
The original report used the words "implosion device," and added that they had later built (but not tested) three thermonuclear devices. I took this to mean that the original implosion devices were fission only, but that what they learned was then applied to tritium boosted devices.

I agree that any tritium that may have been in the original devices has long since dissipated. Furthermore, I don't believe there is any way for these bozos to renew their tritium – so even if they had thermonuclear devices, at this time, they don't.
Anonymous
# Anonymous
Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:04 PM
I imagine that the real risk here would be for the Iraq insurgency to find the devices and transfer them to Iran in exchange for arms & support. The Al Qaida nuts may not be able to get their hands on tritium, but I'm sure Ahmadinejad is has already long since been twisting balloon animals with the stuff thanks to his friends in France and Russia.
Anonymous
# Anonymous
Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:26 PM
I certainly agree that the risk currently lies in Iran, although these guys could put one of the larger devices in a container, ship it to Long Beach/New York/Boston/Norfolk/Seattle, and detonate it in the harbor.

As far as Ahmadinejad having a tritium supply, that is more doubtful. Storing the stuff for extended periods is difficult, he doesn't (we think) have the capability to extract it from oil, natural gas, or sea water – at least not yet. Separating high-grade plutonium is difficult, but not nearly so much as capturing tritium, since the percentage differences in weight are a huge factor.
Anonymous
# Anonymous
Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:37 PM
What I'm suggesting, though, is that Ahmadinejad may simply BUY the stuff, rather than attempt to make it. Both France and Russia presumably have tritium reserves, as well as a long history of whoring themselves out to any thug tall enough to put his nickel on the counter.

With plenty of public support, by the way. I think most Frenchmen—and not a few Russians—would be DELIGHTED to see a nuage-champignon over an American metropolis. Serves us right, dontcha know, for having the audacity to get up and go to work every day.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Most Popular Articles
Cool Windows Resource Kit Utility: cleanspl.exe by Jason Williscroft (Tuesday, February 06, 2007)
v: 9027 | c: 0Article Rating
E-Bomb: The Ultimate Terrorist Weapon by Robert Williscroft (Thursday, December 28, 2006)
v: 3799 | c: 2Article Rating
Global Warming Deniers – Part 1 – Statistics needed by Robert Williscroft (Wednesday, February 07, 2007)
v: 3711 | c: 5Article Rating
Fair Winds, Megan McClung by Jason Williscroft (Monday, December 11, 2006)
v: 3371 | c: 0Article Rating
Digg Censors The Dead Hand Over Climate Change! by Jason Williscroft (Saturday, March 31, 2007)
v: 3128 | c: 1Article Rating
The Chicken Little Agenda: Debunking "Experts’" Lies
Categories
Authors
Archive