| |  |
| 
|
|
jscroft posted on October 09, 2007 07:24  As a former Naval Officer, this headline struck me as so surreal that at first I thought USNA-At-Large's John Howland was circulating a joke. If only! The emphasis below is mine. Consider it the on-screen equivalent of a voice shaking with outrage. From The San Diego Union Tribune: September 22, 2007 – An in-port party that resulted in sailors showing up drunk to fight a shipboard fire contributed to the February dismissal of a San Diego-based destroyer's commander, according to a Navy report obtained by The San Diego Union-Tribune. Cmdr. John J. Pinckney Jr. was relieved after a Navy inquiry revealed how he encouraged other officers and sailors – even those on watch duty – to drink during and after the Nov. 2 reception aboard the Halsey [USS Halsey, DDG 97] for dignitaries in Kagoshima, Japan. The investigation also indicated that Pinckney changed a report to hide the seriousness of the fire that damaged one of the ship's two main reduction gears, which help drive the propellers. The Halsey returned to San Diego on Dec. 24 without further incident. But the Navy linked an explosion and fire in the same gear the next month to Pinckney's incomplete account of the first fire. Damage from the second blaze cost $8.5 million to repair and knocked the destroyer out of commission for six months. At the time of Pinckney's dismissal, Navy officials refused to say why he was relieved, citing privacy restrictions. A brief news release said that Vice Adm. Terry Etnyre, commander of Naval Surface Forces, “expressed his loss in confidence in Pinckney's ability to command” and reassigned him to shore duty. No one else was disciplined in the case, Navy officials said. The Union-Tribune sought a copy of the Halsey investigation in February through the Freedom of Information Act, but the request was denied. The newspaper appealed, and the Navy released an edited version of the report this week. Pinckney, 46, has retired from the Navy after 27 years of service. He could not be reached for comment. The Halsey was commissioned in 2005. Pinckney took command of the destroyer in May 2006, three months before it left on its maiden deployment to the Western Pacific. On the evening of the Halsey's arrival in Kagoshima, Pinckney hosted a two-hour reception for 30 crew members and 40 guests on the ship's fantail. Such parties are a routine courtesy when Navy ships visit overseas ports. The guests left by 8:30 p.m., and Pinckney later opened the party to the entire crew, several officers told naval investigators. Pinckney wanted the sailors to “decompress,” an officer said. Some sailors took their beer to the mess hall, which another officer said “smelled like a brewery.” Two officers said Pinckney insisted that they drink alcohol even though they told him they were on duty. “The (command duty officer) and I realized we may be the only sober line officers on the entire ship,” the duty operations officer that day said in a statement to investigators. “I was fed up, and this situation was totally (unsatisfactory).” Shortly after 10 p.m., alarm bells signaled a fire in a dehumidifying unit of the No. 1 engine room. The duty officers became angry when only about 15 members of the firefighting team responded, several of them too drunk to put on their gear, investigators said. One officer said he randomly grabbed sober-looking sailors to help out. The blaze was extinguished within minutes, but not before it spread to the main reduction gear. The duty officers said they had trouble reaching Pinckney, who had retired to his stateroom. Over their objections, he ordered them not to enter the burned area until morning and not to send a report up the chain of command. An inspection the next morning showed that the fire had charred some wires but had not severely damaged the main reduction gear. Pinckney deleted all references to the gear from the report he filed on the incident, investigators concluded. The fire's spread to the reduction gear might have stayed hidden if not for the second blaze. Pinckney's superiors could have been able to prevent the second fire had they known the extent of the first incident, said Cmdr. Jane Campbell, a Naval Surface Forces spokeswoman. Cmdr. Paul Schlise, an 18-year Navy veteran who served in the Persian Gulf War, took command of the Halsey in March and has shepherded it through the extensive repairs. The ship completed sea trials in late July and is expected to make its second deployment next year.
Tuesday, October 09, 2007 8:01 AM
I'm flabbergasted. It hardly seems possible. There has to be more to this story.
Tuesday, October 09, 2007 8:16 AM
It would be nice to think so, wouldn't it? Here's a little food for thought: the officers taking command of new DDGs today were department heads in Clinton's navy. With only a couple of exceptions, they walked from their first midshipman cruise all the way up to a major command billet without ever seeing a shot fired in anger. We've seen this kind of thing throughout our nation's history... I guess you could make the argument that, in the military, the Peter Principle is an inevitable consequence of peace. When checking all the boxes in an obsolete FXP becomes more important than actual combat readiness, this is what you get. The good news is that, a decade from now, we're going to have some terrific, combat-seasoned officers in charge of our Navy!
Sunday, October 21, 2007 8:45 AM
" new DDGs today were department heads in Clinton's navy...never fired a shot in anger..." I ve got news for you....a large percentage of commanding offcers since...WWII (?)have never fired a shot in anger. Particularly in the combat roles the Navy has engaged in since WWII. Combat , in my mind requires return fire and true life threatening situations. The vast majority of naval operations , even late in WW II were career threating situations if you get my meaning. In any case, your preceding with a flawed premise, bad judgment is hardly eliminated in the ranks by combat duty. Ask Duke Cunningham.  Sunday, October 21, 2007 10:14 AM
Okay, fair enough... but there are a whole lot more John Ripleys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ripley_(USMC)) than there are Duke Cunninghams! Anyway you caught me in a moment of hyperbole. My point is not so much to distinguish the experience of COMBAT as to distinguish the experience of having served in a combat NAVY (or any other service). Mark, I don't know if you've spent any time in the service, but if you had you would know this as a truism: the officers and enlisted men who serve during wartime are exposed to a sense of significance that you just don't get any other way. During peacetime, a military tends to get slowly overrun by bean-counters and bureaucrats. WHen a war breaks out, a military flushes those attitudes and gets back to the basics. When a conflict ends, those who served remain to counteract the intrusion of bureaucracy until the next shakedown. Perhaps you're under the impression that I'm blaming the Clinton in "Clinton's Navy." I'm not. Hell, I was a department head in Clinton's Navy! It's just that Clinton's Navy was the LAST in a long series of peacetime Navys, stretching back to Viet Nam, and I can tell you from personal experience that a lot of the senior department heads and above who I served with--the guys who had spent 15 or 20 years gundecking fleet exercise reports instead of preparing to shoot at REAL bad guys--were a whole lot more concerned with dotting the eyes on their careers than they were with the combat readiness of their ships.
Monday, October 22, 2007 8:36 AM
Ok...as a retired officer and afloat XO I understand what your saying BUT the PG school-Beltway crowd has so permeated the Navy that 20 years of continuous flushing and war wouldn't get rid of them. You know the types...its not the mission, its the career path. I spent my entire career afloat...only to have the PG school-Beltway crowd inform me that PGI duty and actual combat wasn't enough..I needed this tour and that tour and a PG school tour blah blah blah. They all want that PERS tour to line up their path to CNO. Gotta hit the flow point! I fleeted up to an XO billet only because the fellow in that billet was taking liberties with the female crew...and duty on a Auxiliary wasn't the "flow point" anybody in the know wanted. I was so fed up I volunteered for early retirement. It ( meaning the Navy) simply was not fulfilling any more. R/MRF Monday, October 22, 2007 4:45 PM
Sheesh. Mark, I wish I could say I was surprised, but you and I both know that stories like yours are depressingly common. And I share your concern that there may not be enough water in the sea to flush the bilge that's mucking up our Navy right now. But I'm also cautiously optimistic. History teaches us that this is a regular cycle. As bad as the political climate seems out there right now, I really don't think it's any worse than after the post-WWII drawdown, or in the 30s, or after the Civil War. You and I may have had the bad fortune to be born in years that put us at a low point in the cycle, but I think the institution—the Navy, that is—is fundamentally sound. At least, it will be as long as guys like us continue to take an active interest. :)
 Friday, February 29, 2008 8:25 PM
there is a lot to tell of this story that wasn't told. Yes, it is true that a fire did break out. what this story doesn't say is that mr. pinckney was a good captain of our ship. at least to the enlisted people. he was always kind to sailors. greeting them like people. i was on this ship. he made my first and only deployment enjoyable and bearable. he made memories for the sailors that wouldn't have been made possible such as having steal beach picnics on a regular basis. as well as being able to jump in the ocean on three occasions, playing cards with the crew members at night. interacting with the crew. i highly doubt that the new xo would do such a thing. I don't even think he knows how to speak to people who don't have college degrees, the new xo made the life on the halsey a living hell. I mean, mostly every enlisted person thinks he is joe navy. like a freaking robot. sure he will make a great captain as far as pumping out work and slaving his people. but ask anyone on the halsey well the majority how the morale is on that ship. unsat. i am so glad i am off that ship. i missed the old captain. i don't have anything bad to say about the new commander in charge. just the xo. however, that is all the tirade i have to say about mr. pinkney.. call me ignorant or whatever you might. I am not in the navy anymore
 Friday, February 29, 2008 9:42 PM
Jessica-- I hear you. Seriously... when you have a great chain of command on a great ship, you feel like you could step from Okinawa to the Straits of Hormuz without getting your feet wet and eat Osama bin Laden's lunch before breakfast, eight days a week. I get it. But you DO remember safety training, all the way back to boot camp, right? Every mishap follows from a long chain of events, every one of which must be in place for the mishap to occur. Safety's a game of Whack-a-Mole: break those chains of events as fast as they form, or faster. You only have to miss one. That's why the command climate is so important. A Captain whose ship is locked on can sleep at night knowing that his sailors will interdict those impending mishaps as aggressively as he would. A Captain who doesn't cultivate the right kind of command climate winds up with a bunch of intoxicated sailors fighting a main space fire in the middle of a school night. Get it? I'm not saying you have to be a dick to run a tight ship. Hell, in my experience, the LEAST effective officers I've known were complete dicks. But what I AM saying is that, if I have to choose between a hardass CO who runs a tight ship and a sailor's delight who puts my troops in harm's way for no good reason, I'll take the hardass every time. If you'd died fighting that fire, Jessica, Captain Pinckney may have signed the letter home to your mom... but your Chief and your DIVO would have had to WRITE the damned thing, and all the nice-guy foolishness in the world wouldn't have even begun to make up for it. You aren't ignorant, sailor, not by a long shot! Your Skipper isn't the first officer to be relieved for cause, and he won't be the last, but another mark of a good CO is that his troops stand up for him when he screws up. Thanks for checking in with the other side of the story, and I hope you keep in touch. Jason W.
|  |
| |
 | |  | | | Cool Windows Resource Kit Utility: cleanspl.exe by Jason Williscroft (Tuesday, February 06, 2007) | v: 9016 | c: 0 | | E-Bomb: The Ultimate Terrorist Weapon by Robert Williscroft (Thursday, December 28, 2006) | v: 3795 | c: 2 | | Global Warming Deniers – Part 1 – Statistics needed by Robert Williscroft (Wednesday, February 07, 2007) | v: 3709 | c: 5 | | Fair Winds, Megan McClung by Jason Williscroft (Monday, December 11, 2006) | v: 3369 | c: 0 | | Digg Censors The Dead Hand Over Climate Change! by Jason Williscroft (Saturday, March 31, 2007) | v: 3124 | c: 1 |
|
| |  | |  |  |
|